Components

Videoconferencing

Applications

Teaching & Learning

Evaluation

Network

Performance Evaluation Results

Participants

Prior to the lesson, Dr. Srivastava explained the Perceptual Evaluation Scale to the participants while an on-site staff member handed them a questionnaire. After the lesson, each participant completed the questionnaire scoring each of the specific technology componetns.

Evaluation by role

Participant
Video
Audio
RSV

QuickTime

Instructor (Stanford)
5
5
3
2

Instructor (Michigan)

5
5
4
5
Student 1 (Ben)
5
5
3
5
Student 2 (Sanjay)
4
5
4
4

Non Participants

Alex Terzian from Michigan and Juan Carlos Aragon from Stanford independently rated their perceived quality of the different technology components used during the event. Both scored the intrinsic features (video, audio, Remote Stereo Viewer, QuickTime) every 5 minutes during the event. The table below shows the two scores of the raters.

Intrinsic Feature Evaluation

Evaluator
Video
Audio RSV

QuickTime

Stanford
5
5
4
3
Michigan
4.7
4.3
4
5

 






Site Map | | Feedback | Terms/Usage


© 2007 Stanford University. All Rights Reserved